Scott’s List is the evaluator’s desk of this site. I’m a professional evaluator and data scientist by trade, and I trade the VWAP Wave System every session, so every firm, platform, indicator, and tool here is graded the same way: the public facts first, my own experience second, a verdict last. Nothing gets a verdict I wouldn’t stand behind on a voice call with my group.

Charting and indicators

The map. VWAP, the bands, the Initial Balance, and the volume profile live on this chart, and every setup I take starts here.

News and order flow tools

The confirmation tools. The chart gives me the setup; these tell me whether the market means it. A confirmation tool can veto a trade. It never creates one.

Research and AI

The after-the-close tools. They check my math instead of my gut, and none of them is allowed anywhere near the order entry.

Prop firms

Firm reviews, plus the Prop Firms pages with the lessons on trading inside their rules.

Platforms and brokers

Streaming and production

The broadcast bench. Nothing here touches a trade. It’s how the live sessions get from my screen to yours.

How I evaluate

Every review states its evidence level at the top, and I don’t blur them:

• In my stack, used daily. I trade with it. I’ve paid for it. I know where it breaks.
• I’ve held accounts here. For prop firms: I’ve passed their evaluation and traded their funded stage. No certificates on this site, on purpose; they can be faked and the process is the proof.
• Researched; my own notes to follow. The facts are public and the fit assessment is my read. My experience section is honest about being unfinished.

Where a link on a review pays me a commission, it goes through a /go/ address and the disclosure at the bottom says so. A commission never moves a verdict. The full disclosure explains how that’s kept honest.